But just as with a contract, the fine print is what gets you. On the surface it may look good but if you just skim through it you may miss some important clause. That's what happened with the majority of citizens in the Western countries; they heard what they wanted to hear from these politicians, and fell for the deception. These leaders said that multiculti was a failure, and that statement is true. Multiculturalism is a bad idea; it is now and it was then, and it always will be. True as far as it goes. But what Merkel, Cameron, and the Canadian and Australian prime ministers said was that it was a failure but that what was needed to 'fix' it was integration and assimilation. We must just insist that the immigrants stop forming enclaves and speaking their native languages, and insist that they speak the language of the country and start behaving like the native people of the host countries, socially mixing with them, blending in, becoming part of the people.
That was what Merkel and Dave Cameron and all the rest prescribed. More blending. No 'segregation' in living arrangements or education or social life. Freedom of association must not lead to 'segregation' and separation because separation is bad. Jim Crow was evil, according to the popular 'wisdom' because it was separation. Separation=inequality and discrimination. That must not be allowed. It must be banned.
But let's revisit those troubling stories of the New Year's Eve molest-fests in Germany (and now, apparently in Austria, Finland, Switzerland and other countries). Information has come to light that these mob attacks on women and girls were coordinated and planned. This was what I believed; it couldn't just be coincidence that these things happened on a wide scale, and that there were mobs of young mohammedans who just happened to be milling around these places where the assaults took place. Obviously ''social media'' had some hand in coordinating these events and planning them.
"Germany has been shocked at the exposure of the massive criminal nature of the nonwhite “refugee” invasion, with police making dozens of arrests, recovering stolen cell phones in invader centers, and seizing numerous Arabic-German translation guides prepared especially for use in lewd interactions with German women.
[...]
In addition, the Bild reported that many of the arrested nonwhite invaders had cell phones with videos of their mass sex attacks on white women, showing in shocking detail the group nature of the events. The police found 350 hours of video material..."
So these things were not just opportunistic, random occurrences.
Is there no surveillance of Arabic language social media, or do the authorities, so fond of monitoring all communications and cracking down on 'hate speech' towards the poor persecuted moslems, let this kind of thing go unchecked.
Even the Freepers, on this discussion thread, ask whether the powers-that-be want this kind of thing to happen, and purposely allow it:
"The Euro governments knew these were sexual predators. They knew they were mostly male. Then they tried covering up the attacks. Only one logical explanation fits. They want their women raped. Why ? To produce children ?
Well, as I've repeatedly said, 'elites' like Nicolas Sarkozy, the non-French former leader of France, said that 'mixing' was just what was called for. and not only called for, but imperative.
And remember that odious French doctor I quoted in a recent post who made extremist statements about how 'right-wing Frenchwomen' should be raped by immigrants and nonwhites and should be made to bear mixed children as a result of the rapes?
Why, by the way, is he not being prosecuted under France's draconian 'incitement to hatred' laws, under which they prosecuted people like Marine Le Pen, and even Brigitte Bardot, for their 'right-wing' statements? Oh yes, leftists are immune to such charges, as are nonwhites and non-Christians. Those groups are not capable of committing 'hate crimes'.
But as for integration and 'assimilation', many ''conservatives'' who don't bother to think things through also believe that we need to 'assimilate' all the immigrants, and then all will be right. They will blend into our society (and into our gene pool, of course) with scarcely a ripple, and then maybe we will all be more 'vibrant' and enriched, and we'll all have nice tanned skin and not be pasty-white anymore, and our children might be bilingual, and won't that be nice?
But assimilation means merging together so that the end product will be something utterly different and mostly unrecognizable, especially given the genetic distances between us and the New Year's Eve 'forcible assimilators'. Is that what a 'conservative' wants? A conservative should want to keep and guard what is good and natural and true -- and ours, not to casually agree to wholesale change -- against our wills.
Remember how ''integration'' came to this country? At the barrel of a gun. I am old enough to remember the front-page pictures in the newspapers of the troops in Little Rock: armed soldiers or guardsmen with guns, alongside grade-school children who looked on in bewilderment. But the parents were angry, because they knew how this would all go. They knew that 'integration' means blending together.
According to the Oxford Online Dictionary, synonyms for 'integrate' include:
"combine, amalgamate, merge, unite, join, fuse, blend, mingle, coalesce, consolidate, meld, intermingle, mix, intermix, incorporate, affiliate, unify, assimilate, homogenize, harmonize, mesh, desegregate literary commingle"
That's what our older generations in the South took the word to mean. Fuse. Blend. Meld. etc. They knew that social contact, especially starting in early childhood, would break down all natural divisions and lead to socializing, and to intimacy, ultimately.
And that's what the New Year's Eve gang-gropes and mob rapes were about. Mohammedans talk about the 'jihad of the womb' but usually in the context of their women having many more children than Western White women. But at its core it's all about social mixing on the intimate level. That's what all the talk of 'assimilating' and integrating means, when you get to the heart of it. So perhaps the New Year's Eve ''rapist-revelers'' were just trying to follow the edict of Sarkozy and the prescription of Frau Merkel for more ''integration and assimilation."
The authorities have created conditions for chaos on purpose. How much more they are involved in an incident is hard to get a thread of evidence started at first. They are responsible for what happened in Cologne or for similar incidents that are not as widely reported.
ReplyDeleteI'm glad you are questioning this and giving us some angles to think about it.
It is now getting heavy coverage on CNN, which means it will be twisted now against Germans.
Very perceptive on your part VA to recognize their overall strategy is to push blending and ban enclaves of separation for Whites.
ReplyDeleteSomeone at Vox Day commented, a while back, that assimilation = intermarriage. I've used that shorthand a number of times since. Because that's what it ultimately means - even if people learn the local language and mores and adopt local dress and habits, they remain separate and distinct if they all live together and marry amongst themselves. That's what differentiates the Italian-Americans on trash t.v. from those who left the east coast cities, married Irish or Germans or Anglo Americans, and joined the mass of European Americans of mixed nationalities.
ReplyDeleteOther than virtue signalling cucks and/or churchians, genuine conservatives rationally desire their offspring to marry others of the same race. Again, to use shorthand from comments elsewhere, race > religion and nationalism > politics. Complete and ultimate integration/assimilation means marrying the other, and creating something different. Anecdotal, I know, but I can think of quite a few couples/families I've known of mixed religion or race, and despite avowals of not having a preference for one or another, or letting their children "choose," it never worked out that way. Having children seems, quite naturally, to bring out one's instincts for heritage and ancestry. All the professed "agnostic Jews" suddenly found it vital that their "mixed" children be raised as Jews. Purportedly assimilated/Americanized Chinese or Indians suddenly felt a deep need for their children to learn their non-American parent's native tongue and cuisine, and so forth. Additionally, since most other races are far more communal than Whites, the children ended up spending vast amounts of time with their non-American grandparents and extended families, and their White parent, now totally outnumbered and out-influenced, went along as the children became "assimilated Americans" in name only. By visual race, by religious belief, by cultural habits, they cleaved far more to their non-American side. Haven't many already noted this about Mulattoes? The same applies for any mixed marriage, and any kind of mixture.
There are always outliers and exceptions, but none that disproves the rule. Multiculturalism, integration, or assimilation: call it what one wills, it always ends up meaning the end of the White race and European civilization.
OA - I believe that the powers-that-be in Germany and elsewhere don't have to be directly involved. They just have to import a few tens of millions of immigrants/refugees and mix them amongst the native population, stir and serve. These New Year's Eve assaults are the natural result, given the toxic recipe the Western governments have concocted.
ReplyDeleteThe governments can then disavow responsibility and throw up their hands and say they can't prevent these things, and besides you haters are causing all the problems, etc. The answer for the PTB is always more surveillance, more curtailing of our freedoms -- while the invaders are given freedoms beyond ours: we don't have free rein to run amok in the streets whereas they do; the police are told to stand down and the lying media sweep the crimes and terror acts under the rug as much as they can, and spin the ones they can't hide, blaming the 'xenophobe Islamophobe racist fascists' for any and all trouble that occurs.
Sheila - good point about the direction that 'integration' or assimilation usually takes. The result is usually that the influence of one culture on the other goes one way: we are being forcibly assimilated to everybody else, in every way from our speech, tastes in music, food, cultural celebrations, religion, etc. while they absorb, at the most, only the lowest elements of pop culture vis mass media from the host culture. We are losing our cultural integrity while the Others can keep their ways unchallenged.
And yes, with mixed matings the offspring almost always choose to identify with the Other side, not the White or Christian side as a rule. Who wants to be part of boring, White-bread, bland nothing Anglo culture, when you can be ''exotic'' and ''vibrant'' and ''authentic''? Besides, in some cases, one ethnicity is genetically dominant, and the phenotype then appears as the dominant type, not equally both. One is or one isn't. Some things have to be either/or, not both, as some think.
-VA
From eliotlakenews:
ReplyDelete"A report issued by the United States Immigration Commission around the turn of the previous century (circa 1900), stated that the Aryan (White) races made up almost half of the world’s total population. United States Census reports for the year 1920 indicated that one-third (33%) of the earth’s population was still White.
By 1970, Whites had come to account for only about one-quarter (25%) of the total world population.
Today, at the beginning of the 21st century, less than ten percent (10%) of the earth’s population is still of essentially White European racial stock."
To borrow a title from the great English-American commentator John Derbyshire: We Are Doomed.
The actual figure varies between 7% – 10%, depending on how strictly our definition of “White” is applied. For example; some statistics include Jews in the category of “White”, and most include White Hispanics. (Note: A mere 2% of the world’s population are White women of child-bearing age.)
Somehow the final paragraph got separated from the rest of the quote, with my own comment mysteriously placed in between. Oops.
DeleteShouldn't allow immigration from cultures or beliefs disallow mingling. It's counter productive and isn't there enough of that here?
ReplyDelete